Which is better for coding?
Pick Codex when you want a coding agent that carries a task from the CLI, an IDE extension, ChatGPT, or Codex Cloud. The listing puts it ahead of Copilot for that reason: it is built to carry a coding task, not only to assist inside an editor. Pick GitHub Copilot when you want the assistant the listing says is most likely to already be in the editor and on GitHub. It is described as broader and more integrated than a specialist agent, and less of a standalone coding environment than Cursor.
What are the Coding ranks?
Codex is #3 and GitHub Copilot is #4 for Coding on AgentForTheJob. Third as OpenAI's coding agent for a repository: CLI, IDE extension, ChatGPT, and cloud tasks. It sits behind Cursor, the editor people work in, and Claude Code, the other dedicated repository agent. It is ahead of Copilot because Codex is built to carry a coding task, not only to assist inside an editor. Fourth because it is the assistant most likely to already be in the editor and on GitHub. It is broader and more integrated than a specialist agent, and less of a standalone coding environment than Cursor.
Can a vendor pay to change this?
No. Ranks on AgentForTheJob are editorial. A sponsored card is labeled Sponsored and does not change the numbered list.
Where should I confirm pricing?
Codex: Included with ChatGPT plans, including Free and Go. Usage limits vary by plan. Codex Cloud is available to eligible Plus, Pro, Business, Enterprise, Healthcare, and Education accounts, and is not included with Free or Go. Confirm current limits on openai.com. GitHub Copilot: A free tier exists in supported editors, with paid Individual, Business, and Enterprise plans. Confirm on GitHub.